|
Post by juthi52943 on Jan 4, 2024 4:04:44 GMT -5
With professional or commercial activity. The Data Protection Commission, citing the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Rynes vs Urad case , indicates that the concept of a purely personal or domestic activity should be subject to a strict, narrow interpretation. The extension of the registration area from a private area to a public. Place cannot be considered as taking place in the Job Function Email List course of a purely personal or domestic activity. Although this judgment was issued on the basis of a different factual situation relating to the use of CCTV cameras, its conclusions may be potentially important from the point of view of the use of car cameras that record public places. For this reason, the driver should assess. Whether the scope of his use of the camera is really only personal in nature or whether it will fall under the provisions on the protection of personal data. Whenever a camera is used in activities such as taxis, buses, or professional drivers, there cannot be any exception for purely personal or domestic activities.In such a situation, the driver or other person who decides to use the camera the employer must take into account.
|
|